.png)
GLP-1 Cases Live or Die on the Prescribing Timeline
Surface the full GLP-1 prescribing and treatment history
The GLP-1 litigation wave is moving fast, and every case rests on the same core question: can you connect the prescription to the injury and prove the timeline holds?
Claimants present with gastroparesis, bowel obstruction, and other serious gastrointestinal injuries.Their prescribing history spans primary care, endocrinology, and urgent care. Their treatment records are distributed across hospitals, GI specialists, and emergency departments that don’t show up in a phone intake.
By the time firms commit to a GLP-1 case, they should already know what the medical record says. SettLiT makes that possible.
What Makes GLP-1 Qualification So Operationally Expensive
GLP-1 litigation requires firms to establish a precise causal chain: drug, dose, duration, and injury. Every link in that chain needs documentation. And at intake, most claimants can’t give you the complete picture of their prescribing history or the sequence of providers who treated their GI complications.
inCOMPLETE INTAKE NARRATIVES
Claimants often don’t recall which prescribers initiated or continued their GLP-1 medication, or the full sequence of GI care that followed. The timeline that matters most to the case is also the hardest to reconstruct from a conversation.
SLOW MEDICAL RECORD RETRIEVAL
Without knowing which prescribers, gastroenterologists, and hospitals are in scope, firms can’t begin retrieval. Identifying the relevant providers takes weeks before a single record isordered.
CAPITAL DEPLOYED TOO EARLY
Firms commit to case workup before confirming the prescribing history and injury timeline are verifiable. When the medical record doesn’t support the claim, those resources are gone.
LATE LITIGATION
SURPRISES
Defense surfaces prescribing gaps, prior GI diagnoses, or inconsistencies in the treatment record that undermine causation after significant investment has already been made.
Build the Medical Cases Before You Commit to the Legal One
The firms moving fastest through GLP-1 qualification aren’t starting with retrieval. They’re starting with intelligence: structured data that tells them whether the prescribing and injury history supports the case before resources are deployed.
What SettLiT Helps Firms Surface in GLP-1 Cases
SettLiT connects to national health data networks and structured medical datasets to surface the signals that matter in GLP-1 litigation.
These may include:
Claims data surfaces gastroparesis, intestinal obstruction, and ileus diagnoses, plus ER visits, hospital admissions, and surgical procedures related to GI complications
Pharmacy data returns GLP-1 dispensing records with NDC codes confirming exact product (Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, Zepbound) and fill history establishing duration of use
Provider discovery identifies endocrinologists, weight management clinics, primary care prescribers, and gastroenterologists across the claimant's care history
Treatment timelines show emergency department encounters, inpatient stays, and procedure codes that document severity of injury
This intelligence helps attorneys understand whether the causal chain holds before a single record request is made.
Mapping Data to MDL 3094 Eligibility
GLP-1 gastroparesis claims require proof of product use and documented injury. SettLiT maps directly to the evidentiary requirements:
Prescribed Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, or Zepbound
Pharmacy data returns dispensing records with NDC codes confirming exact product and fill dates
GLP-1
Duration of Use
Fill history establishes prescribing timeline to correlate with injury onset
Diagnosed with Gastroparesis, Intestinal Obstruction, or Ileus
Claims data returns ICD-10 codes confirming qualifying GI diagnoses
Injury required hospitalization or surgery
Treatment data shows ER visits, inpatient admissions, and surgical procedures documenting severity
Claimant-Level Intelligence at Docket Scale
GLP-1 dockets can grow fast. But each case still depends on one claimant’s specific prescribing timeline, oneset of GI events, one set of provider relationships that either support causation or don’t.SettLiT surfaces that individual picture at scale.
Structured health intelligence across every claimant in your docket so qualification decisions are grounded in data, not intake narratives.
Confirm the Timeline Before You Commit
In GLP-1 litigation, the gap between what a claimant reports and what their medical record actually shows can be the difference between a qualifying case and a resource write-off. Firms that begin case workup without closing that gap absorb both the operational cost and the strategic risk.
SettLiT surfaces structured prescribing and treatment intelligence early so teams build a clearer picture before committing. More complete case workups. Less administrative burden during the retrieval phase. Faster movement toward qualified dockets and resolution.
See What Defense Will See, First
The most damaging moments inGLP-1 discovery often involve information plaintiff counsel never had access to. Prior GI diagnoses that predate the prescription. A prescribing gap that undermines continuous use claims. An alternative causation argument buried in a specialist’s notes.
SettLiT surfaces that information early. When litigation teams have visibility into the full prescribing history and provider network before deposition and discovery, they prepare from a position of strength, not surprise.
Why Mass Tort Firms Choose SettLit For GLP-1 Case Qualification
digital health intelligence First
Understand the prescribing and injury timeline before committing to case workup.
Provider discovery
Surface the full network of prescribers, GI specialists, and facilities relevant to each claim.
structured medical outputs
Clean, structured data in formats built for litigation workflows and team review.
Targeted retrieval enablement
Focus record requests on the providers and cases with the strongest evidentiary foundation.
Scalable docket workflows
Consistent qualification processes across hundreds or thousands of claimants.
Integration Ready Infrastructure
Built on Marble’s standards-based health data infrastructure.
Testmonials
Results from our
partners experience
“This is so simple, it eliminates the need for faxing, emailing, or mailing requests—everything is handled automatically through the system.”
.svg)
Mass Tort Firm
Attorney
"We recently transitioned to a different AI platform and we have used it for less than a month, but it's not great. So, I think we're trying to explore other options, and this looks incredible."
.svg)
Personal Injury Practice
Paralegal
“48 hours is amazing. We're not used to that at all."
.svg)
Personal Injury Practice
Attorney
"I mean, this is a dream come true... Because it's so hard to get medical records. And now there's this database where you can get them in minutes or days."
.svg)
Personal Injury Firm
Litigator
"Yeah, they are complex. One of the reasons that it's nice to see it all at a glance because this is taking me a lot longer just to get about a quarter of the data. So this is pretty awesome... Yeah, nice to see it in real time, you know, give me information that I just had no idea about."
.svg)
Personal Injury Firm
Attorney
.svg)
